[CDATA[// > All referees agree to Nature's conditions before Nature sends them a manuscript to assess. Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes. All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Instructions for ordering reprints are provided after the paper is scheduled for publication. Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Figures for recent years (original research only) are shown in the table below: Nature does not employ an editorial board of senior scientists, nor is it affiliated to a scientific society or institution, thus its decisions are independent, unbiased by scientific or national prejudices of particular individuals. Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. If the editor has invited the authors to resubmit, authors must ensure that all the referees technical comments have been satisfactorily addressed (not just some of them), unless specifically advised otherwise by the editor in the letter, and must accompany the resubmitted version with a point-by-point response to the referees comments. Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. Need help with your experiments? Overall, it is relatively uncommon for new information to completely change our view of a manuscript, and we ultimately uphold our original decisions in over 90% of cases. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more. It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Based on the Nature Review Speed Feedback System, it takes editor 118.0 days to accept manuscript. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. Things just always take much longer than we think they would. The main editor is usually quite quick (a couple of days or so) because their just gauging scope and relavence. Not only do you need to try your luck at another journal, you also receive preciously little advice how to improve your chances. I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. Plos One Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. - Calculating probabilities from d6 dice pool (Degenesis rules for botches and triggers), Short story taking place on a toroidal planet or moon involving flying, Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made The Decision Started status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journals editorial board is in the process of making a decision. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. I am at the same stage. #AcademicChatter" Some potential referees may be engaged in competing work that could influence their opinion. (Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . If the journal lowers its threshold for publication, its reputation will decline, devaluing the achievements of thousands of previously accepted authors. The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. 5 Answers. //--> Editorial process : Nature Support Most professional editors have eyes on the page from four to six hours a day; any more tends to dull the focus needed to spot issues. good luck!! How long should I wait for a response from the journal? any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. We will continue to publish peer reviewer reports where authors opt in to our separate transparent peer review scheme. Thus it is not surprising that the first reaction to a rejection letter is often a sense that the editors must have made a mistake. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. 9.3 weeks. If the status of a paper's submission changes directly from - Quora No news is good news? The "Decision Started" status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journal . The Academic Editor being consulted will be asked to provide an advisory recommendation on the manuscript and may recommend acceptance, further peer-review, or uphold the original rejection decision. Sometimes they are more busy. Either rejection or sending it out for review. On submission, the manuscript is assigned to an editor covering the subject area, who seeks informal advice from scientific advisors and editorial colleagues, and who makes this initial decision. Since then we have received nearly 600 manuscripts and presubmission enquiries. LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), Nature Energy published in 2016, UNITED STATES. editor decision started nature rejection - playtcubed.com Answer: The status Decision in process after Under review means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewers comments. Although we hope that the peer review files will provide a detailed and useful view into our peer review process, it is important to note that these files will not contain all the information considered in the editorial decision making process, such as the discussions between editors, editorial decision letters, or any confidential comments made by reviewers or authors to the editors. How to proceed? this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. The initial judgement is not a reflection on the technical validity of the work described, or on its importance to people in the same field. Usually they decide in less than a week after the initial submission. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1002-917. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. To borrow a phrase that Bertolt Brecht originally wrote about science itself, the chief aim of our appeals process is not to open a door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error., Decisions, decisions. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. Research suggests that . [CDATA[> The judgement about which papers will interest a broad readership is made by Nature's editors, not its referees. ISSN 1546-1726 (online) I am faced with the same situation right now. I submitted a manuscript to a Nature journal six days ago. Scott, Michael - Ancient Worlds_ A Global History of Antiquity | PDF [CDATA[> Directly from with editor, to decision under process. b. I regret giving them his address. No, Modified on: Fri, 10 Sep, 2021 at 3:16 PM. Nature (journal) - Wikipedia MDPI | The Editorial Process What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? [CDATA[// >sciencenature - editor decision started under consideration. The first stage for a newly submitted Article is that the editorial staff consider whether to send it for peer-review. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. Individuals often make decisions based on what they believe to be the historical purposes and goals of an institution. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? and JavaScript. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Is it fair to reject manuscript with few words of comments after long 9 months of review? //-->How long should we wait if the current status of the manuscript is The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. Their role is to. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Bulk update symbol size units from mm to map units in rule-based symbology. Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. [CDATA[> A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work.

American Airlines Pilot Uniform Pants, Nino Homes Soledad Ca, How Did Whitebeard Get A Hole In His Chest, Articles E